[Fmpro] From whom......entitlement to pay?

[Les Hurdle]

I do not know Mr Kelly, I do not know, Marcahti............ words were 
atributed t me which I did not utter or type.

The real point which everyone is missing is simply this.

WHEN, a movie or TV show is sold, it is sold at a commercial 
level.......... the fact the musicians were paid less makes no 
difference.
GIVEN, the product sold at some film fare for the same price as a large 
budget movie, then the musos should have been either paid at the going 
rate or be compensated.

What amazes me most is how bent out of shape you all are about unions, 
who really don't look out for you [er hum Sound Exchange !!], yet when 
it comes to the PRO's, who treat you 100 times worse....... the list is 
mostly quiet.

Who are you all so afraid of?

I'm out of here as of Tuesday so flame away ;-).

have fun

les



On Oct 2, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Marcahti at aol.com wrote:

>
> In a message dated 2/10/06 14:01:21, leshurdle101 at sbcglobal.net writes:
>
> << PLEASE note.......... why ? they are not entitled  2 it.......... 
> are
> not my words.
> from the UK I think.
>
> L
>
> On Oct 1, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Phil Kelly wrote:
>
>> The statement below is the most unprofessional remark I've ever read 
>> on
>> this BBS >>
>
> so u pay someone w/ 3 yrs exp same as someone w/ 30 ? MY WORDS Les   I 
>  am
> not  ' someone from uk '....u KNOW it is ME !!! If u have learnt 
> NOTHING in 40
> years then that is PATHETIC
> _______________________________________________
> The Film Music Pro List is sponsored by Film Music Magazine -  
> http://www.filmmusicmag.com
>
> To edit your list options or unsubscribe, visit:
> http://nxport.com/mailman/listinfo/fmpro
>