[Fmpro] FMPRO Digest, Vol 24, Issue 4

[flight007@aol.com]

Hi Pete,

Please be assured there was no 'attack' intended in my post. Your 
voice, opinion and input are very much respected. It matters little how 
many library pieces you, Les or I may have out there if those pieces 
are not surveyed, or small value arbitrarily placed upon them by a body 
of our peers. From commission, be it from publisher of production 
company, to royalties, be they performance or mechanical, composers 
have ever decreasing control over their product. United we stand and 
parted we fall. At the moment we are shouting at each other from 
mountain tops, each one of us separated from the other by our desire to 
work. We are getting closer, thanks to the presence of the FMPRO Digest 
and other forums, but not yet close enough.
Keep up the good work.

Vic

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pete <musical411 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Fmpro] FMPRO Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3
To: fmpro at nxport.com
Message-ID: <20070406165711.21940.qmail at web53710.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

--- Vic wrote:
> Think about all the films and documentaries that you
would have us believe your music has been applied to.

I'm not sure where that attack is coming from. But,
for the record, I have just over 500 library pieces
floating around out there. Some of it makes it's way
to UK TV. I'm sure you and Les have more than that,
but I think it's enough to entitle me to a voice in
the matter.

Best,
P e t e
S u r d o v a l
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free 
from AOL at AOL.com.