[Fmpro] Getty QQQQQQ's

kirbyko3@aol.com kirbyko3 at aol.com
Wed Oct 3 20:31:07 GMT 2007


Les, if one's agreement with Pump is that PA acts as agent for your music, and their accepting your music doesn't guarantee usage, and no payment is due you unless your music gets placed, why do you think that I, as a composer, should get a percentage of the sale price?



That's like saying that if someone bought Gorfaine-Schwartz, every composer they rep should get a percentage of the sale.? I don't see the connection.



Kerry


-----Original Message-----
From: LesHurdle <leshurdle at avradionet.com>
To: fmpro at nxport.com
Sent: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 4:19 pm
Subject: Re: [Fmpro] Getty QQQQQQ's





On Oct 3, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Mark Northam wrote:

> But the question still
> stands: what does PA exactly own?
>
> * Only a license?

No the question still is, what did they sell the Getty folk;
1   A business model only?
2   YOUR product?

If it's your product.. where is your share of the profit from the sale?

L


_______________________________________________
The Film Music Pro List is sponsored by Film Music Magazine -  
http://www.filmmusicmag.com

To edit your list options or unsubscribe, visit:
http://nxport.com/mailman/listinfo/fmpro


________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com



More information about the FMPRO mailing list