[Fmpro] anyone seen this technology?? O.o

[Louis King]

I'm the first guy to shell out cash for a player ... however if I can  
not have to call someone in to change 1 note !!!!!


I much prefer it


On Mar 13, 2008, at 8:20 PM, Christopher Alpiar wrote:

> Yea Louis, I agree that technology is luscious and the benefits are
> amazing. I just think we need to all consider the ramifications, I
> forget all the time wrapped up in samplers and computers. Just don't
> forget when you use that technology to bypass that session that you
> save some cash on, those musicians didn't get paid for a job that
> might have been, and you have affected change in the structure we have
> and since you have affected it, you must gestalt and see what the
> consequences will/might be.
>
> What will the shape of the business of Film Music (composers,
> orchestras, orchestrators, copyists, etc) be in 20 years? 50 years? Do
> you even care? (not saying you don't, just a question to all)
>
> On Mar 13, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Louis King wrote:
>
>> Truth is there is a flip side to this I don't think you take into
>> account.
>>
>> The technology can be used to alter/change the SOULFUL music I write
>> that has been preformed by actual musicians ( union ones BTW) when
>> the need be. This allows me to not have to pay another session fee to
>> bring back players/ singers to make a change that is asked for at a
>> later date.
>>
>> The machines can be used however you choose to.
>>
>
> Christopher Kennedy Alpiar
> Cinematic Composer
> www.alpiar.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Film Music Pro List is sponsored by Film Music Magazine -   
> http://www.filmmusicmag.com
>
> Best of FMPRO: http://www.fmproquotes.com - Quotes site  by Billy  
> Hale Music
>
> To edit your list options or unsubscribe, visit:
> http://nxport.com/mailman/listinfo/fmpro

"New York City is like a big ship ... and the water is on fire" - Tom  
Waits